Showing posts with label obesity. Show all posts
Showing posts with label obesity. Show all posts

Sunday, February 7, 2010

THE DANGERS OF OBESITY


Obesity has become an epidemic in the United States and is a serious issue in most developed countries. Starting with the Industrial Revolution, labor-saving inventions were welcomed into our homes and workplaces, making us far more productive, but also far more sedentary. We no longer beat the rugs; we vacuum carpeting. We do not chop wood; we turn up the thermostat. Rather than walk to town or ride a horse, we drive a car. And we rarely cook foods from scratch, rather we are far more likely to buy packaged foods for convenience, or have a meal in a restaurant.

The Silent Killer

But hidden in the midst of such convenience exist some recently-discovered dangers. Eating more and moving less has created millions of Americans who are overweight, and tens of thousands who have reached the level of obesity. Obesity is defined by the National Institutes of Health as having a body mass index (BMI) of 30 or higher. For someone 5’10” tall, that would equate to weighing over 209 pounds. “Overweight” according to the BMI index, would be between 174 and 208 pounds, or a body mass index of 25 to 29.9.

The most dangerous aspect to obesity is that, in essence, it is a nearly silent killer. Weight is usually gained slowly enough so that the body adjusts, and the effects are not felt for some time. Additionally, many of the most dangerous effects of obesity are hidden inside the body: the strain on the heart, narrowed arteries, and increased blood flow are not easily recognizable symptoms, and hence are easily ignored. But sooner or later, if left unchecked, these tiny cracks in the foundation of one’s health will result in devastating consequences.

Obese individuals have a 50% to 100% greater chance of dying from a given cause than those of normal weight. To make matters worse, extra poundage stresses the body, compromising the immune system, causing such individuals to more easily fatigue, and depressing the immune system. Thus, when an obese individual catches a cold, the flu, or other illness, he or she has far fewer resources for fighting the disease.

Obesity stresses the lungs as well as the heart, resulting in more labored breathing. Reduced lung function may lead to an increase in colds, bronchitis, and pneumonia. Being overweight and obese has also been shown by several studies to be linked to an increased risk of cancer. Often the specific tie between the cause and effect has yet to be identified, but research indicates that factors such as decreased immune system functionality or increase in the amount of adipose tissue, (where cancer cells are often found) may well play a significant role. Lack of exercise is also a proven risk factor, especially for breast cancer. A study by the Women’s Health Initiative showed that even 1.25 to 2.5 hours per week of brisk walking may reduce a woman’s risk of breast cancer by 18%.

The Good News

The good news is that weight is a situation individuals can control. Changes in diet, increases in exercise, talks with a doctor, and evaluation of the many products available to assist in the quest for lower weight can all have a positive impact. Taking control of your weight is the first step in reducing the dangers of obesity to your overall health. Nutritional cleansing has been shown by abundant anecdotal evidence to drastically reduce the level of obesogens present in the body. With the absence of these toxins, the body no longer needs to hold on to the associated fat needed to protect its vital organs. This results in a measurable drop in body fat levels which in turn leads to weight loss. Isagenix Cleansing Programs will give you the head start you need. Order now

Friday, January 15, 2010

Correlation Between Eating Too Quickly and Overeating

over eating
Obesity Epidemics and ‘Loss of Control’ Eating
It is becoming common knowledge that wealthy Western countries such as the USA are facing what is increasingly referred to as an ‘obesity epidemic’. A report published in the American Psychological Association’s Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology in 2007 made reference to a tripling in the prevalence of pediatric overweight issues in recent years – a development which may well have serious health implications for a new generation of Americans. As a major public health issue, making sense of why and how individuals become overweight is of pressing concern.

The researchers who wrote this report investigated the eating behaviors of 445 children and adolescents, and concluded that youths who experienced ‘Loss of Control’ (‘LOC’) eating episodes were significantly more at risk of obesity than others. Loss of Control eating was described to the youngsters as ‘like a ball running downhill’ in order to convey the sense that it is often experienced as an unstoppable phenomenon. As with adults who experienced it, the regular occurrence of LOC eating was associated with obesity and psychological distress (subjects felt ashamed and unhappy both about their behavior and their overweight appearance, negative emotions which in themselves contributed to further LOC eating episodes).

Clearly, finding ways of interrupting and preventing loss of control eating may be an important key to promoting healthy weight amongst both young and old alike. But just how is LOC eating associated with unhealthy weight gain? What physiological and hormonal responses might be involved?

Rapid Eating and Appetite Regulation
Research published in the Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism (JCEM) has indeed identified a possible physiological mechanism for LOC eating. Loss of control eating is associated with eating very quickly, and the rapidity of food ingestion is a key factor in weight gain. Eating too quickly leads to over-consumption rather than satiation, and there is a physical cause for the result: rapid food ingestion inhibits the secretion of hormones which are normally released when food enters the stomach – hormones which inform the brain that food satiation has been reached. In other words, these hormones effectively signal the brain to stop any further eating behavior. Two hormones in particular (Peptide YY and Glucagon-like Peptide-1) have been shown in previous studies to be associated with appetite regulation; they are released after eating and act on the brain to generate feelings of fullness and satisfaction. Eating behavior stops once the hormones have been activated.

The new study specifically considered the effect of different rates of eating on the release of appetite-regulating hormones. Subjects were all asked to eat the same meal (300ml of ice cream) but at different rates. Blood samples measuring the levels of plasma lipids, glucose, insulin and appetite-regulating hormones were taken before the meal and at intervals of 30 minutes after eating had commenced, ending at 210 minutes. Subjects who took a full 30 minutes to eat their ice cream showed significantly higher concentrations of both Peptide YY and Glucagon-like Peptide-1 as compared with those who ate much more quickly. Subjectively, the slower eaters also reported higher levels of food satiety.

Time to Slow Down
The researchers suggest that the high-technology, high-speed modern world we live in may be contributing to rapid eating: far more people are tempted to ‘snatch a quick bite’ while essentially on the move, rather than sitting down to a proper leisurely meal time. In a nutshell, it could well be that high pressure working conditions, which permit insufficient time to eat properly, are encouraging individuals to fall into a rapid eating pattern. The result is over-consumption and dissatisfaction, a lamentable combination that fosters further rapid over-consumption.

The implications of the research are actually rather pragmatic, provided there are no entrenched psychopathological factors contributing to over-consumption. Where eating is associated with desperate, ‘quick-fix’ counter-depressive measures, for example, the emotional issues may have to be addressed before (or alongside) the implementation of a practical eating strategy. But some simple practical measures can be identified.

Most importantly, the key message is: ‘Slow Down!’ Slowing down the pace of eating makes it considerably harder to overeat. Eating a meal little by little, pausing every now and then, allows the brain more time to receive the hormonal messages, enabling it to generate conscious feelings of fullness much more effectively (it is estimated that the stomach takes approximately 20 minutes from the commencement of eating to produce the appetite-regulating hormones).

Unlike rapid eating, slow eating has no adverse effects on health and will produce only positive health benefits, chiefly by significantly reducing the risk of obesity through over- consumption. Moreover, it fosters a different form of food enjoyment as compared to that of instantaneous re-fuelling: people begin to taste food more fully when they eat slowly, savoring and appreciating it, pleasures which not only encourage further slower eating but a desire to eat better quality food. Indirectly, a more leisurely pace of eating may restore a kind of social pleasure to eating – sitting down to a meal with friends or work colleagues is intrinsically more pleasurable than swallowing fast food between phone calls or while walking back to the office.

Finally, as everyone who has eaten too rapidly knows all too well, eating quickly predisposes individuals to unpleasant side-effects such as gastro esophageal reflux (or heartburn). In this instance, it truly is healthier to be slow.

Practical and straightforward though the ‘slow down’ message may sound, it does appear to fly in the face of powerful cultural trends. The speed of life appears to be increasing, not decreasing, and finding the brake pedal – even simply for a modestly leisurely lunch – may be much more difficult to institute in practice. It is likely to be more successfully if engaged in as a collective exercise, rather than an individual one. Recruiting just one friend or work colleague for lunch – even once or twice a week at the outset – is at least a beginning. And a small group might well establish a new culture.

Its all about eating the right stuff at the right pace. UltraFitnessDynamics